dt050398

Julian Myers, Letters to the Editor, "Thin end of the privacy wedge", Connected, Daily Telegraph, London, 5^th March 1998

I was pleased to see Connected publicise the Government's plans for controlling the use of encryption technology ('Privacy row over encryption law', February 26). There has indeed been much speculation on the Internet (most effectively from Sean Gabb of the Libertarian Alliance) about the possible nature of, and the claimed need for, legislation. Labour's plans for a voluntary scheme are, of course, only the start. After a 'respectable' period they will announce that the voluntary scheme is not working and 'regretfully' introduce laws to back it up. At this point all will probably be lost.

The integrity of those corporate bodies who dare to protest will be impugned using arguments such as 'If you're not criminals what have you got to hide?' Against private individuals simple innuendo will suffice.

We should ask ourselves the question 'Why a voluntary scheme?' The answer could be that the argument, and therefore the need, for legal enforcement is not strong enough. Or it could be that the Government's motives are ulterior and would not stand the public airing necessary to pass a law? A poor choice.

Julian Myers Julian@velodog.demon.co.uk